[Previous entry: "10 Questions for Porter Goss"] [Next entry: "Global warming in Africa: The hottest issue of all"]

06/20/2005:

"Memos Show British Concern Over Iraq Plans"

LONDON - When Prime Minister Tony Blair's chief foreign policy adviser dined with Condoleezza Rice six months after Sept. 11, the then-U.S. national security adviser didn't want to discuss Osama bin Laden or al-Qaida. She wanted to talk about "regime change" in Iraq, setting the stage for the U.S.-led invasion more than a year later.

President Bush wanted Blair's support, but British officials worried the White House was rushing to war, according to a series of leaked secret Downing Street memos that have renewed questions and debate about Washington's motives for ousting Saddam Hussein.

In one of the memos, British Foreign Office political director Peter Ricketts openly asks whether the Bush administration had a clear and compelling military reason for war.

"U.S. scrambling to establish a link between Iraq and al-Qaida is so far frankly unconvincing," Ricketts says in the memo. "For Iraq, `regime change' does not stack up. It sounds like a grudge between Bush and Saddam."
Full: yahoo.com

This 'news' just keeps breaking and breaking. Maybe it is the smoking gun. Bush is expendable if he gets too unpopular. A democratic president would serve the terrible status quo just as well, and put a kinder gentler face on it. Nothing like a big impeachment trial to divert and distract.