Archive for the 'General' Category

Poll: Iraqis back attacks on US troops

Friday, September 29th, 2006

(AP) WASHINGTON About six in 10 Iraqis say they approve of attacks on U.S.-led forces, and slightly more than that want their government to ask U.S. troops to leave within a year, according to a poll in that country.

The Iraqis also have negative views of Osama bin Laden, according to the early September poll of 1,150.

The poll, done for University of Maryland’s Program on International Policy Attitudes, found:

–Almost four in five Iraqis say the U.S. military force in Iraq provokes more violence than it prevents.

–About 61 percent approved of the attacks — up from 47 percent in January. A solid majority of Shiite and Sunni Arabs approved of the attacks, according to the poll. The increase came mostly among Shiite Iraqis.

–An overwhelmingly negative opinion of terror chief bin Laden and more than half, 57 percent, disapproving of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

cbs4.com

The return of Palestinian refugees is an existential necessity for Israeli Jews

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

 

 

In order to maintain the cohesion of Israeli Jewish society against the spectre of a “warm peace” with its neighbours, the Zionist state must maintain distrust among Jews towards the Arab nation, emphasize the “European” identity of their state (as distinct from the surrounding “barbarian” states) and engage in provocations whenever the “threat” emerges that a peace may ensue. For this reason, the Zionist state is, by its very nature, a permanent threat to its environment.

 

 It is often assumed that a massive return of Palestinian refugees to locations within the State of Israel – in accordance with international law and human rights – would be contrary to the interests of Israeli Jews and may endanger their physical existence. It cannot be denied that a massive return would significantly change the demographic composition of the population. There is, however, no particular reason to believe that such a return would physically endanger Israeli Jews, if the consequent population movement is properly organized in order to ensure the availability of housing and work opportunities.

However, there is another aspect of the argument for the Palestinian right of return which is often not addressed, namely the desirability of such a return for Israeli Jews. I will briefly explain why this is so.

Zionism, Israel’s official ideology, is predicated upon the necessity for Jews to remain in control of their state. This means that it must at all times and by all means ensure that Jews remain a demographic majority within the state. A situation of “warm peace” between the State of Israel and its neighbours would, however, undermine the Jewish character of the state through a gradual integration of Jews within the Arab (mostly Muslim) Middle East. Economic and cultural intercourse between Israel and its neighbouring Arab states would bring Israelis to Arab capitals and Arab businessmen, tourists, workers and students to Israel. From a Zionist perspective, such a scenario is a threat, as it would dilute the Jewish character of the state, culturally and demographically.

The most effective deterrent against Jewish assimilation in the “diaspora”, apart from self-imposed isolation (which is particularly the case with ultra-orthodox Jews), is anti-Semitism. Zionists are keen to dramatize anti-Semitism or, at times, to give it a helping hand, in order to keep Jews from assimilating or cause them to move to Israel.

In order to maintain the cohesion of Israeli Jewish society against the spectre of a “warm peace” with its neighbours, the Zionist state must maintain distrust among Jews towards the Arab nation, emphasize the “European” identity of their state (as distinct from the surrounding “barbarian” states) and engage in provocations whenever the “threat” emerges that a peace may ensue. For this reason, the Zionist state is, by its very nature, a permanent threat to its environment. While the Zionist state may be able to maintain its provocative existence for a number of years, its aggressive nature will inevitably undermine the moral fabric of its Jewish population and its capacity to sustain itself.

Since World War II, Jews have been living in many predominantly Christian countries as religious minorities with full civil and political rights. There is no reason to believe that Jews cannot live with full rights within predominantly Muslim societies, which have traditionally been less discriminatory towards Jews. If Jews wish to remain living in the Middle East, they will have to gracefully accept that they are a minority in an Arab region and do so in a positive manner.

The return of Palestinian refugees will create for Israeli Jews unique opportunities to demonstrate their will to live in peace and equality with Arabs within a democratic unitary state. Such a vision would accommodate both the interests and aspirations of Palestinians and those of Jews. Such a vision would help liberate Jews from their self-imposed concept of a ghetto-state and end their isolation in the Middle East. The same rationale was pursued successfully by the African National Congress, which provided not only the liberation of the black majority from apartheid, but also the liberation of the white settler community from the role of oppressors from which they could not escape by themselves.

btinternet.co.uk

Hi-tech firm boycotts Israel over ‘war crimes’

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

Following the recent war in Lebanon, Ynet has received several complaints from Israeli companies that have encountered refusal of companies from various countries to cooperate with Israelis because of the war.  

Avner, an Israeli businessman specializing in product management and consulting approached a Belgian company in hopes of business cooperation. The company, U2U, refused to cooperate with the Israeli businessman because of what they called “Israel’s war crimes and apartheid regime.”

 

U2U manager Wim Yotrasprot wrote in a statement to Avner obtained by Ynet that “I appreciate your interest in my company, but after the devastating and inhumane war crimes Israel perpetrated in Lebanon, and because of the apartheid regime it rules on Palestine, U2U does not wish to tie itself with Israeli products.”

ynetnews.com

U.S., Syria spar and Rice calls for sanctions

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – The United States and Syria locked horns on Tuesday, with Washington urging others to join it in imposing sanctions on Damascus and Syria telling America to stop trying to impose its will on Arabs.

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem told the United Nations General Assembly that the world pays the price when the U.S. government thinks it knows what Arabs want better than the Arabs themselves.

Washington has long listed Syria as a “state sponsor of terrorism” and relations have worsened with the United States accusing Syria of helping to fuel the insurgency in Iraq. Damascus denies both charges.

…In his U.N. speech, Rice’s Syrian counterpart said it was essential that the United States and other countries draw up a schedule for withdrawing from Iraq. He insisted it would help curb the violence there.

“Tragically enough, we all end up paying the price when the decision makers in Washington believe that they know better, and are in a better position to understand and grasp the needs and circumstances of the Arabs,” Moualem said.

“They diagnose the ambitions and aspirations of the Arab individual in a manner that is tailored to their own vision.”

Moualem assailed the United States for its support of Israel and other policies in the Middle East, saying the flow of U.S. weapons to Israel was sowing destruction. He also criticized those who finance and support what he called the injustices of the Israeli occupation of Arab territories.

“The Palestinians are subjected to a crippling blockade because the advocates of democracy were dissatisfied with the results of the elections in the Palestinian territories,” Moualem said.

today.reuters.com

UN says Gaza crisis ‘intolerable’

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

Standards of human rights in the Palestinian territories have fallen to intolerable new levels, says a UN expert on the Mid-East conflict. John Dugard said Israel was largely to blame for turning Gaza into “a prison” and “throwing away the key”.

He also criticised Canada, Europe and the US for cutting funds to Palestinian Authority, run by the Hamas militant group which does not recognise Israel.

An Israeli official said the statement was unrealistic and over-simplified.

Mr Dugard, UN special rapporteur on Palestinian human rights, said three-quarters of Palestinians in Gaza now depended on food aid – a result, he added, of Israeli military raids, blockades and demolitions. 

“I hope that my portrayal… will trouble the consciences of those accustomed to turning a blind eye and a deaf ear to the suffering of the Palestinian people,” Mr Dugard told the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.

bbc.co.uk

The Sound and the Fury: Venezuela’s leader talks to TIME’s Tim Padgett about why he lashes out against President Bush

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

TIME: Why do you attack President George W. Bush with such jolting language?

CHAVEZ: I believe words have great weight, and I want people to know exactly what I mean. I’m not attacking President Bush; I’m simply counterattacking. Bush has been attacking the world, and not just with words–with bombs. When I say these things I believe I’m speaking for many people, because they too believe this moment is our opportunity to stop the threat of a U.S. empire that uses the U.N. to justify its aggression against half the world. In Bush’s speech to the U.N., he sounded as if he wants to be master of the world. I changed my original speech after reading his.

TIME: But doesn’t your rhetoric–referring to Bush, for example, as an “alcoholic”–risk alienating potential allies?

CHAVEZ: First of all, Bush has called me worse: tyrant, populist dictator, drug trafficker, to name a few. I was simply telling a truth that people should know about this President, a man with gigantic power.

TIME: Is all of this mostly for domestic consumption back in Venezuela?

CHAVEZ: No. American author Noam Chomsky in his book [Hegemony or Survival: America’s Quest for Global Dominance] talks of two superpowers in today’s world–one is the U.S., which aggressively wants to dominate the world, and the other is global public opinion. I don’t consider what I’m saying personal attacks on President Bush–I want to wake up U.S. and global public opinion about him.

TIME: Do your feelings about Bush reflect your feelings toward America in general?

CHAVEZ: No. I revere America as the nation of Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King and Mark Twain–who was a great anti-imperialist, who opposed U.S. adventurism in the Spanish-American War.

time.com

Chavez’s sound and fury, unlike Macbeth’s, signifies something.

Poll: Lieberman leads Lamont in Conn.

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

Sen. Joe Lieberman has a 10-point advantage over Democrat Ned Lamont among likely Connecticut voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday.

Lieberman, a three-term Democrat running as an independent after losing the party nomination in a primary, is favored by 49 percent to 39 percent over Lamont in the three-way race. Republican Alan Schlesinger trails with 5 percent.

The race has tightened slightly since an Aug. 17 poll that showed Lieberman leading 53 percent to 41 percent.

“Ned Lamont has lost momentum,” said poll director Douglas Schwartz said. “He’s gained only two points in six weeks. He’s going to have to do something different in the next six weeks or … Lieberman stays in for another six years.”

The race is seen as many as a referendum on President Bush’s handling of the Iraq war. Lamont, a political newcomer and multimillionaire, ran on an anti-war platform to upset Lieberman in the Aug. 8 primary.

news.yahoo.com

yeah well this is one they can’t afford to lose…any mean necessary you know…

Unfriendly forces brewing in Latin America: US

Monday, September 25th, 2006

WASHINGTON: The US military’s top general warned on Friday that forces unfriendly to the United States are brewing in the Americas, arguing that “together we need to do something about it.”

General Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, singled out Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez who this week attacked President George W. Bush as the “devil” in a speech to the UN General Assembly.

“There have been increases in government actions that are not friendly to us,” Pace said in a question-and-answer session with Pentagon employees. “President Chavez is clearly not a friend to the United States.”

He said it would be interesting to see what impact Chavez’s speech would have on Venezuela’s quest for a seat on the US Security Council.

thenews.com

LA Times: Chavez to Double Energy Subsidies to the Needy in U.S.

Child Hunger in the Land of Abundance Makes Us All Poor

…While it is normal to expect high levels of hunger and poverty in a developing country, it may come as a surprise to observe a similar epidemic in one of the richest countries in the world. The Food Bank for New York City recently reported that nearly 20 percent of children in the city rely on free food to survive. According to statistics from Bread for the World, 13 million children went to bed hungry in the United States in 2004, the most recent year for which statistics are available.

Israeli judge orders release of Hamas officials

Tuesday, September 12th, 2006

JERUSALEM – An Israeli military judge on Tuesday ordered the release of 21 Palestinian Hamas officials detained in a dragnet launched after a soldier was abducted by gunmen in the Gaza Strip, an army spokesman said.

A lawyer for the detainees said the release roster issued by Ofer Military Court included at least three Palestinian cabinet ministers and a lawmaker. But implementation of the ruling was deferred until Thursday so prosecutors could appeal.

“Twenty-one Hamas officials are to be released, but this has been put on hold for 48 hours so the prosecution can file challenges,” an army spokesman said, adding that a successful appeal would put the release on hold.

Israeli forces took at least 30 Hamas officials, among them Palestinian cabinet ministers and lawmakers including parliament Speaker Aziz Dweik, into custody after Corporal Gilad Shalit was seized in a June 25 border raid.

Israel said the detainees were suspected of offences linked to Hamas’ role in spearheading a 6-year-old Palestinian revolt. But Palestinians accused Israel of gathering “bargaining chips” to force Shalit’s release.

A lawyer representing some of the detainees, Osama al-Saadi, said he expected the Hamas officials to be released on bail, raising the prospect of their future prosecution by Israel.

The army spokesman had no immediate comment on the terms of the release.

Hamas, an Islamic group whose charter calls for Israel’s destruction, trounced the long-dominant and more moderate Fatah faction in Palestinian elections last January, prompting an aid embargo by Western donor nations.

In a bid to break the diplomatic deadlock, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, the Fatah leader, announced on Monday that a coalition government would be formed with Hamas.

But Israel and the United States remained skeptical pending clarification of whether the new administration would recognize the Jewish state and renounce violence, preconditions set for restoring aid.

A Hamas spokesman said the group had no intention of recognizing Israel, and Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, a Hamas leader, said the new government would not negotiate with Israel.

msnbc.msn.com

First off, are they going to be released or not? Second, was this not a mass kidnapping? What nauseating swill. The whole article. And this is where millions come to get their ‘news.’

U.S. count of Baghdad deaths excludes car bombs, mortar attacks

Tuesday, September 12th, 2006

…Within weeks of the kickoff of the Baghdad security plan, the U.S. military’s top spokesman, Maj. Gen. William B. Caldwell, boasted that the murder rate in Baghdad had fallen by 46 percent and attributed most of the fall to the new security sweeps. 

On Thursday, Caldwell revised the figures, posting a statement on the website of the Multi-National Force-Iraq that the murder rate had dropped even more – by 52 percent from July. 

That claim was immediately contradicted by the morgue figures, which trickled out in accounts by various news organizations citing unnamed officials. 

Johnson said he couldn’t comment on morgue figures and declined to release the raw numbers on which Caldwell’s claim was based. He said the numbers were classified and that releasing them might help “our enemy” adjust their tactics. 

“We attempt to strike the right balance, being as open and transparent as possible without providing information that places our troops or Iraqi civilians at undo risk by the enemy adjusting their tactics for greater impact,” he said, in explaining the decision not to release the figures.

realcities.com/mld